good and evil

What is good and evil, other than the untruth of them being polar opposites settled through a subjective or objective form to do the better that is of existence? They are but terminology thrown down for the analytical purpose of establishing suppression.
The terminology good and evil are untruths; they are too subjective to diagnose right actions and virtue for the objectivist in normative ethics. For example, water is not hot nor cold but to the individual who senses it; while one finds the water hot one may find it cold, a lack of an absolute. For any coherence in what the water or moral is requires measurements to be made for an understanding that can be universally interpreted, a present absolute. Humans cannot measure morality as it is beyond human comprehension. Humans can only see the phenomenon, so humans can only perceive their existence as they know it; ethics requires the consideration of all meaning, which cannot be done.
In essence, morality is transparent as its originality of its value comes from a forgotten or misleading establishment, a church or state for relation to such, and it imprints from an individual’s upbringing. Morality becomes an established necessity; when really a moral was a means or mean for an agenda of a majority, the establishments attempt to suppress the minority from his desired actions. Unfortunately the naive individual takes the untruth of morality as a truth, as the rest of humanity goes as follow.